Baker, Donald C. “Introduction: The Relation of the Hengwrt Manuscript to the
Variorum Chaucer Text.” In The Canterbury Tales: A Facsimile and Transcription of the
Hengwrt Manuscript, with Variants from the Ellesmere Manuscript. Ed. Paul C. Ruggiers. Norman, Okla.:
University of Oklahoma Press, 1979. xvii-xviii.
Benson, Larry D. “The Order of The Canterbury Tales.” Studies
in the Age of Chaucer 3 (1981): 77-117.
Blake, Norman F. “The Relationship between the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of
the Canterbury Tales.” Essays and Studies 32 (1979): 1-18.
Blake, Norman F. The Canterbury Tales. Edited from the
Hengwrt Manuscript. York Medieval Texts, second series. London: Edward Arnold, 1980.
Blake, Norman F. “On Editing the Canterbury Tales.” In Medieval
Studies for J. A. W. Bennett aetatis suae LXX. Ed. Peter L. Hayworth. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.
Blake, Norman F. “The Editorial Assumptions in the Manly-Rickert Edition of The Canterbury Tales.” English Studies 64 (1983): 385-400.
Blake, Norman F. The Textual Tradition of the Canterbury Tales.
London: Edward Arnold, 1985.
Brusendorff, Aage. The Chaucer Tradition. 1925. Gloucester, Mass:
Peter Smith, 1968. [Hengwrt = “He”]
Caie, Graham D. “The Significance of the Early Manuscript Glosses (with Special
Reference to the Wife of Bath’s Prologue).” Chaucer Review
10 (1975-76): 350-60.
Caie, Graham D. “The Significance of Marginal Glosses in the Earliest Manuscripts of
The Canterbury Tales.” In David Lyle Geffrey, ed. Chaucer and
Scriptural Tradition. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1984. 75-88.
Campbell, Jackson J. “A New Troilus Fragment.” PMLA 73 (1958): 305-8.
Christianson, C. Paul. “A Community of Book Artisans in Chaucer’s
London.” Viator 20 (1989): 207-18.
Dean, James. “Dismantling the Canterbury Book.” PMLA 100
Dean, James. Forum Reply to Charles A. Owen, Jr. PMLA 101 (1986):
Dempster, Germaine. “Manly’s Conception of the Early History of the Canterbury Tales.” PMLA 61 (1946): 379-415.
Dempster, Germaine. “On the Significance of Hengwrt’s Change of Ink in the
Merchant’s Tale.” Modern Language Notes 63 (1948): 325-30.
Dempster, Germaine. “A Chapter of the Manuscript History of the Canterbury Tales.” PMLA (1948): 456-84.
Dempster, Germaine. “Fifteenth-Century Editors of the Canterbury Tales and the
Problem of Tale Order. ” PMLA 64 (1949): 1123-42.
Donaldson, E. Talbot. “The Ordering of the Canterbury Tales. ” Medieval Literature and Folkore Studies: Essays in Honor of Francis Lee Utley. Ed. Jerome Mandel and Bruce
A. Rosenburg. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1970. 193-204.
Doyle, A. I., and M. B. Parkes. “The Production of Copies of the Canterbury Tales and the Confessio Amantis in the Early Fifteenth Century.” In
Ed. M. B. Parkes and A. G. Watson, eds. Medieval Scribes, Manuscripts, and Libraries: Essays
Presented to N. R. Ker. London: Scolar Press, 1978. 163-210.
Doyle, A. I. and M. B. Parkes. “Paleographical Introduction.” The Canterbury Tales: A Facsimile and Transcription of the Hengwrt Manuscript, with Variations from the
Ellesmere Manuscript. Ed. Paul Ruggiers. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1979. xix-xlix.
Doyle, A.I. “The Copyist of the Ellesmere Canterbury
Tales.” In Martin Stevens and Daniel Woodward, eds. The
Ellesmere Chaucer: Essays in Interpretation. Ed. San Marino, CA & Tokyo: Huntington Library &
Yushodo Co., Ltd., 1995. 49-67.
Eadie, J. “The Importance of Hengwrt: Two Studies.” English
Studies 71 (1990): 32-4.
Elliott, C. “ ‘The Reeve’s Prologue and Tale’ in the Ellesmere and
Hengwrt Manuscripts.” Notes & Queries 209 (1964): 167-70.
Fisher, John H. “Animadversions on the text of Chaucer, 1988.” Speculum 63 (1988): 779-93.
Furnivall, Frederick J., ed. The Hengwrt Manuscript of Chaucer’s
Canterbury Tales. Chaucer Society, series 1, nos. 3, 9, 27, 39, 51, 71. London: Trübner,
Furnivall, Frederick J., ed. Autotype Specimens of the Chief Chaucer MSS,
Part I. Chaucer Society, Series 1, no. 48. London: Trübner, 1876. [facsimile of fol. 204r]
Hammond, Eleanor P. Chaucer: A Bibliographical Manual. 1908; rpt. New
York: Peter Smith, 1933. 196
Hanna, Ralph III. “Problems of ‘Best Text’ Editing and the Hengwrt
Manuscript of The Canterbury Tales.” In Derek Pearsall, ed. Manuscripts and Texts: Editorial Problems in Later Middle English Literature. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer,
Hanna, Ralph III. “The Hengwrt Manuscript and the Canon of The Canterbury
Tales.” English Manuscript Studies 1100-1700 1 (1989): 64-84.
Horobin, Simon, and Linne R. Mooney. “A Piers Plowman
Manuscript by the Hengwrt/Ellesmere Scribe and Its Implications for Standard English.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 26 (2004): 65-112.
Kane, George. “‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Manuscripts: Texts and
Critics.” In John V. Fleming and Thomas J. Heffernan, eds. Studies in the Age of Chaucer,
Proceedings, No. 2 1986. 137-45.
Killough, George B. “Punctuation and Caesura in Chaucer.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 4 (1982): 87-107.
Kolve, V. A. “The Cook’s Tale and The Man
of Law’s Introduction: Crossing the Hengwrt/Ellesmere Gap.” pp. 257-296 in Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative: The First Five Canterbury Tales. Stanford: Stanford University
Manly, John M. and Edith Rickert. “The ‘Hengwrt’ Manuscript of
Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales.” National Library of Wales Journal 1 (1939):
Manly, John M., and Edith Rickert, eds. The Text of the Canterbury Tales:
Studied on the Basis of All Known Manuscripts. 8 vols. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1940. 1:266-83.
McCormick, Sir William and Janet E. Heseltine. The Manuscripts of
Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales: A Critical Description of Their Contents. Oxford: Clarendon, 1933. 245-51.
McIntosh, Angus, M. L. Samuels, and Michael Benskin, eds. A Linguistic Atlas
of Late Mediaeval English. 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen Univ. Press, 1986. 4:299 [LP 6400].
Mooney, Linne R. “Chaucer’s Scribe.” Speculum
81 (2006): 97-138.
Mooney, Linne R., and Estelle Stubbs. Scribes in the City: London
Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375-1425. Woodbridge, Suffolk:
York Medieval Press (Boydell & Brewer), 2013. Chapter 4, et passim.
Mosser, Daniel W. “‘Chaucer’s Scribe,’ Adam, and the Hengwrt
Project.” Design and Distribution of Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts. Ed.
Linne R. Mooney and Margaret Connolly. Woodbridge, Suffolk and Rochester, New York: York Medieval Press and
Boydell and Brewer, 2008. 11-40
Owen, Charles A., Jr. “The Canterbury Tales: Early Manuscripts
and Relative Popularity.” JEGP 54 (1955): 104-10.
Owen, Charles A., Jr. “A Note on the Ink in Some Chaucer Manuscripts.” Chaucer Newsletter 2.2 (1980): 14.
Owen, Charles A., Jr. “The Alternative Reading of The Canterbury
Tales: Chaucer’s Text and the Early Manuscripts.” PMLA 97 (1982):
Owen, Charles A., Jr. Forum Response to James Dean’s “Dismantling the
Canterbury Book” PMLA 101 (1986): 251-52.
Owen, Charles A., Jr. “Pre-1450 Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales:
Relationships and Significance.” Chaucer Review 23 (1988): 1-29; 95-116.
Owen, Charles A., Jr. The Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales.
Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1991.
Partridge, Stephen Bradford. “Glosses in the manuscripts of Chaucer’s
‘Canterbury Tales’: An edition and commentary.” Diss. Harvard University, 1992.
Pearsall, Derek. The Canterbury Tales. London: George Allen & Unwin,
1985. Chapter 1: “Date and Manuscripts.”
Pratt, Robert A. “The Order of the Canterbury Tales.” PMLA 66 (1951): 1141-67.
Ramsey, Roy Vance. “The Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales: Different Scribes.” Studies in Bibliography 35 (1982):
Ramsey, Roy Vance. “Paleography and Scribes of Shared Training.” Studies in the Age of Chaucer 8 (1986): 107-44.
Ransom, Daniel J. “Hengwrt, Ellesmere, and the Variorum
Chaucer.” Chaucer Newsletter 8.2 (1986): 1-2.
Robinson, P. M. W. “Can We Trust Hengwrt?” in G. A. Lester, ed. Chaucer in Perspective: Middle English Essays in Honour of Norman Blake. Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.
Ruggiers, Paul G., ed. The Canterbury Tales: A Facsimile and Transcription
of the Hengwrt Manuscript, with Variants from the Ellesmere Manuscript. Norman, Okla.: University of
Oklahoma Press, 1979.
Samuels, M. L. “Chaucer’s Spelling.” Middle English
Studies Presented to Norman Davis in Honour of his Seventieth Birthday. Ed. Douglas Gray and E. G. Stanley.
Oxford: Clarendon, 1983. 17-37. Rpt. in The English of Chaucer and his Contemporaries: Essays by
M. L. Samuels and J. J. Smith. Ed. J. J. Smith. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1988. 23-37.
Samuels, M. L., and J. J. Smith. “The Language of Gower.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 82 (1981): 295-304. Rpt. in The English of Chaucer and his
Contemporaries: Essays by M. L. Samuels and J. J. Smith. Ed. J. J. Smith. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University
Press, 1988. 13-22.
Seymour, Michael C. “Hypothesis, Hyperbole, and the Hengwrt Manuscript of the Canterbury Tales.” English Studies 68 (1987): 214-19.
Seymour, Michael C. “Of this Cokes Tale.” Chaucer Review
24 (1990): 259-62.
Seymour, Michael C. A Catalogue of Chaucer Manuscripts. Volume II, The
Canterbury Tales. Aldershot and Brookfield: Scolar Press, 1997. 31-4.
Smith, Jeremy J. “The Trinity Gower D Scribe and his Work on Two Early Canterbury Tales MSS.” In J. J. Smith, ed. The English of Chaucer and his
Contemporaries. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1988. 51-69.
Stubbs, Estelle, ed. The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile (CD-ROM).
Leicester, England: Scholarly Digital Editions, 2000.
Tatlock, J. S. P. “The Canterbury Tales in 1400.” PMLA 50 (1935): 100-319.
Tschann, Judith. “The Layout of Sir Thopas in the Ellesmere,
Hengwrt, Cambridge Dd.4.24, and Cambridge Gg.4.27 Manuscripts.” Chaucer Review 20